A BV and B BV entered into a management agreement with a duration of 3 months. Under this agreement, B BV was obliged to pay an amount of € 6,500 per month, excluding VAT, for the management activities. Parties continued the collaboration after the end date of the agreement. There was no dispute between them, that B BV would owe an amount of € 6,500 per month, excluding VAT, for this.
B BV ran into difficult financial circumstances. Parties agreed not to invoice all amounts due under the aforementioned agreement. If the financial conditions would improve, invoicing would still take place.
B BV has included in its financial statements a provision for the management services not yet invoiced. A BV has reported a similar receivable in its annual accounts.
Additional assessments were imposed on A BV. The question to the court is whether A BV had an obligation to issue invoices for the amounts, and therefore whether A BV owed the related VAT under Article 13 of the Dutch VAT Act.
According to the lower court, A BV and B BV continued to act in accordance with the agreements made and the management activities carried out by A BV took place for a fee. A BV should have issued invoices to B BV. Insofar as it has not done so, under Article 13 of the VAT Act, it is liable to pay VAT at the time when A BV should have issued the invoices. The Tax Authorities have therefore correctly assessed VAT.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Author: Joyce Westerveld, VAT Advisor at RED
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Mandatory E-Invoicing in the EU: What Does ViDA Mean for Your SME Clients?
- Dutch Tax Authorities Announce Major Changes to 13th Directive VAT Refund Procedure
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- VAT OSS in the Netherlands: Managing Multi-Channel Marketplace Sales and Bookkeeping Challenges
- Cabinet Response to ViDA E-Invoicing and Digital Reporting Report Sent to House of Representatives













