The Supreme Court recently considered whether a “BV” could deduct the VAT in respect of attorney’s fees from its shareholder. The Supreme Court finds that the Court of Appeal wrongly failed to pay attention to the BV’s argument that it had to purchase these services in connection with the continuation of its business activities. The case was referred back to the Den Bosch Court for further investigation of the facts.
Source: BDO NL
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No VAT Deduction on Apartment Purchase: Mixed Residential and Business Use Confirmed
- Low VAT Rate for Culture, Media, and Sports Maintained After Positive Implementation Test
- EU Advocate General: Loyalty Points Not Free for VAT Purposes in Lyko Case
- Advisor’s Recommendation on VAT-Exempt Staff Provision: No Penalty Imposed by Court
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Photo Mosaics and Contour Collages, Court Rules
