The Supreme Court recently considered whether a “BV” could deduct the VAT in respect of attorney’s fees from its shareholder. The Supreme Court finds that the Court of Appeal wrongly failed to pay attention to the BV’s argument that it had to purchase these services in connection with the continuation of its business activities. The case was referred back to the Den Bosch Court for further investigation of the facts.
Source: BDO NL
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Court Rules Outsourced Payment Processing Qualifies for VAT Exemption
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Head Spa Treatments at Hairdressers, Dutch Tax Group Rules
- Comments on ECJ C-232/24: Both factoring but also invoice financing subject to VAT
- Netherlands Plans Mandatory Peppol-Based B2B E-Invoicing Regime by July 2030
- Netherlands Tourism at Risk: Experts Warn VAT Hike Could Harm Industry and Economy
