AG Opinion
Having regard to the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court should reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) as follows:
Article 135(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a single supply of management services, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is provided by an IT platform belonging to a third-party provider to a fund management company and includes both special investment funds and other funds, does not fall within the scope of the exemption laid down in that provision.
Sources:
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 case pending
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-580/16 (Hans Bühler) – Late submission of recapitulative statements should not disqualify a business from exemptions
- ECJ/General Court VAT Cases – Pending cases
- New ECJ VAT Case T-680/25 (Mercedes Benz) – No details known yet
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 3 Judgments, 3 AG Opinions till November 13, 2025
