AG Opinion
Having regard to the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court should reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) as follows:
Article 135(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a single supply of management services, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is provided by an IT platform belonging to a third-party provider to a fund management company and includes both special investment funds and other funds, does not fall within the scope of the exemption laid down in that provision.
Sources:
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- General Court T-643/24 (Credidam) – AG Opinion – Unauthorized use of copyrighted works incurs VAT on fees
- General Court T-646/24 (MS KLJUCAROVCI) – Judgment – Triangular transactions can qualify for VAT simplifications despite delivery variations
- Comments on GC T-657/24: VAT exemption for credit intermediation applies when the intermediary searches for and recruits customers
- Briefing documents & Podcasts: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
- ECJ on the relevant sale for determining the transaction value of goods
