Mr Louw put forward a number of points which he submitted gave the Company a reasonable excuse, and Ms Rashid made submissions in response. I have considered each of those points below, and have gone on to decide in relation to each point whether the relevant facts were proven and if so whether they amounted to an objectively reasonable excuse.
For the reasons explained in the main body of this decision, I found that the Company did not have a reasonable excuse, and that the surcharges were not disproportionate.
Source: bailii.org
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK to Mandate E-Invoicing for VAT by 2029: Gradual Rollout Planned
- TUC Leader Urges Closer EU Ties, Including Customs Union, to Boost UK Economy and Living Standards
- Navigating Cross-Border VAT: Compliance Essentials for Gibraltar’s Digital Economy and B2B/B2C Risks
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Deductibility for Professional Fees in Share Sale Transactions
- UK Tribunal Rules Personalized Book Services VAT-Exempt as Primary Supply is Book Production
