Mr Louw put forward a number of points which he submitted gave the Company a reasonable excuse, and Ms Rashid made submissions in response. I have considered each of those points below, and have gone on to decide in relation to each point whether the relevant facts were proven and if so whether they amounted to an objectively reasonable excuse.
For the reasons explained in the main body of this decision, I found that the Company did not have a reasonable excuse, and that the surcharges were not disproportionate.
Source: bailii.org
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Budget 2025: VAT E-Invoicing, Digital Compliance, and Post-Brexit Tax Reforms Announced
- FTT Rules HMRC Closure Notice Bars VAT Registration: Hairdresser’s Turnover Below Threshold, Appeal Allowed
- UK Tribunal Rules Self-Employed Hairdresser Not Liable for VAT Registration Under Rent-a-Chair Model
- EU Insists on VAT Representative for UK Firms Despite British Objections to Import Rules
- Mandatory B2B e-invoicing as of April 2029
