AG Opinion KrakVet Marek Batko sp. K. (C-276/18)
Some interesting discussions and conclusions on:
- the “indirect” participation in transport in distance sales – ”disptach vs. transportation”
- the interpretative value of the VAT Committee guidelines – just ‘guidance” – not binding
- the value of a binding ruling concluded between supplier and authorities in the Member State where the supplier is established
- Art. 32(1) vs. art. 33
- Impact of legislation only effective Jan 1, 2021 (2017/2455)
See also Link
ECJ case 276/18 in slide format
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on ”Public bodies” (Art. 13)
- Latest Trends in Global VAT Compliance for Online Businesses in 2026
- EU – IOSS Scheme: Customs & Business Benefits for E-Commerce Vendors
- Comments on ECJ C-527/24: Right to VAT Refund Despite Technical Glitch in Cross-Border Application
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 2 Judgments and 2 Hearings till April 16, 2026
