The Supreme Tax Court following the judgment of the ECJ found that the appellant’s services were taxable. The services provided by the appellant did not, as required by ECJ case law, give rise to any of the legal and financial changes which are characteristic of the transfer of a sum of money.
Source: PwC Germany
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- New E-Invoice Rules: Mandatory Validation and 8-Year Storage of Validation Reports in Germany
- Germany Updates FAQs on Mandatory E-Invoicing: Key Clarifications and Transitional Provisions Explained
- When Is E-Invoicing Mandatory? Exceptions and Voluntary Cases Under German VAT Law
- VAT Remission for Contractors in Reverse-Charge Cases After Incorrect § 13b UStG Application
- Input Tax Deduction Allowed in Year Invoice with VAT Is First Issued, Even for Prior Year Services
