This short paper discusses the introduction of a general reverse-charge mechanism in the EU VAT system to address missing trader fraud. It argues that this move presents significant disadvantages, the most important of which is that it effectively transforms the VAT into a de facto Retail Sales Tax (RST), by removing the self-enforceability features that characterises it. It concludes that whilst a generalised reverse-charge mechanism may well kill missing trader fraud, in the process it may also give birth to a widespread, more fundamental, VAT compliance problem that will be much harder to either contain, or combat.
Source: Rita de la Feria
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ VAT C-544/24 (Nekilnojamojo turto valdymas) – AG Opinion – National law’s fixed late payment interest aligns with EU law
- ECJ C-639/24 (FLO VENEER) – Judgment – VAT exemption cannot be denied due to missing specific evidence defined by Quick Fixes
- Briefing Document & Podcast: VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) – Single EU VAT Registration
- Briefing Document & Podcast: VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) – Platform Economy
- VAT Committee – General Principle for Calculating Annual Turnover under the SME Scheme
