Source: curia.europa.eu (official link with background info not available yet)
- For the first project, the applicant bought a piece of land on which it would construct a production hall for a producer of elevators. The producer would rent this for 10 years.
- For the second project, the applicant purchased a plot of land and buildings (where the producer had its business).
- Via these two projects, the applicant wished to build an office tower and shopping centers – and the producer would reduce its housing costs.
- However, due to the economic crisis, the first project was shut down in 2008. As a result, the producer of elevators was forced to rent an alternative space.
- The question is, among other things, whether a person that acquires a good or service for the purpose of providing a taxable activity is entitled to input VAT recovery, and if that right continues to exist even if that good or service at a certain point is no longer used for the original intended purpose due to circumstances beyond the control of the taxable person that occur after acquisition of the good or service.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Clarifies 0% VAT Documentation for Intra-Community Supplies: Key 2025 Ruling for Businesses
- Key CBAM Changes for EU Importers Effective January 2026: New Thresholds and Reporting Rules
- GENA Urges EU to Harmonise and Expand Digital E-Invoicing in Public Procurement Reform
- Audit Office Monitors Council’s VAT Filing Amid Potential £600k HMRC Fine Risk
- EU VAT Gap 2023: Key Findings, Country Comparisons, and Policy Insights from Mind the Gap Report
