Article by Gerhard Badenhorst of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
The stated policy of the South African Revenue Service (SARS) not to make value-added tax (VAT) apportionment rulings effective retrospectively to prior financial years has been questioned on several occasions. The matter was recently considered by the Tax Court in the case of Taxpayer v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (VAT2063) [2019] ZATC 2 (15 November 2019) where the Tax Court found in favour of SARS.
Source: Mondaq
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- South Africa Raises VAT Registration Thresholds in 2026/2027 Budget Proposals
- South Africa’s Transition to E-Invoicing and Digital VAT Reporting: Plans, Timeline, and Objectives
- SCA Clarifies “Enterprise” Scope Under VAT Act: SARS v Woolworths Holdings Ltd Explained
- South Africa to Launch Real-Time VAT Compliance with E-Invoicing by 2028, Says SARS
- South Africa to Mandate E-Invoicing and Real-Time VAT Reporting by 2028
