UT concluded that the lease was not entered into to provide the School with income from exploitation of the building, but to facilitate the provision of a union for students. In the UT’s view, this was not a business activity, and VAT recovery was not possible.
Source: bailii.org
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Littlewoods Wins VAT Input Tax Appeal on Product Photography Costs for Online Retail Sales
- HMRC Withdraws Linked Goods VAT Concession; No Change to Policy or Compliance Obligations
- Economic Reality Prevails Over Contractual Form in VAT Dispute with HMRC
- HMRC Policy paper Revenue and Customs Brief 1 (2026): Removal of linked goods concession
- UK Reduces Late Payment and Repayment Interest Rates
