Plaintiff operates an app. The app is an e-wallet with which payments can be made with the smartphone. The court is of the opinion that the defendant has not made it plausible that the plaintiff’s services have the characteristic and essential functions of payments or remittances. The respondent has also not made it plausible that the plaintiff’s services consist of mediation. This leads to the conclusion that Plaintiff is entitled to deduct input VAT.
Source: rechtspraak.nl (Dutch)
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence
- Decree on Mediation in Securities Transactions with Instructions on the Scope of the Concept of Mediation Published
- Tax Penalty for VAT Reduced Due to Incidental Carelessness; Court Lowers Fine to €1,500
- Thrift Shops Return to Court to Challenge VAT on Second-Hand Goods
- E-invoicing and Digital Reporting for Cross-border Transactions Starting July 2030
