Judgment of the Court of Justice in the case Imofloresmira — Investimentos Imobiliários.
Articles 167, 168, 184, 185 and 187 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC must be interpreted to the effect that they preclude national legislation which provides for the adjustment of the value added tax initially deducted on the ground that a property, for which the right to opt for taxation was exercised, is regarded as no longer being used by the taxable person for the purposes of its own taxed transactions, where that property has remained unoccupied for more than two years, even though it is established that the taxable person has sought to rent it during that period.
Source Previews details – TaxLive
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- General Court T-638/24 (Finanzamt Österreich) – AG Opinion – VAT on Intra-Community Acquisitions Not Precluded by Errors
- Commission Backs Italy’s VAT Derogation on certain vehicles Through 2028
- Comments on GC T‑575/24 – AG – Contrary to EU law if services provided to members are regarded as internal acts
- Comments on ECJ C-515/24 (Randstad España) – AG – Introduction of exclusion of VAT deduction of representation expenses by Spain not contrary to EU law
- Briefing Document & Podcast: VAT concepts ”Chain Transactions” & ”Triangulation” explained based on ECJ/CJEU cases
