- The case concerned VAT obligations from 2012 to 2016 and set-offs made by the FTA after administrative criminal proceedings.
- The Federal Supreme Court (FSC) agreed with the lower court’s limitation of the dispute and the determination of the additional tax claim still in question.
- Some taxpayer complaints were rejected as the taxpayer was not adversely affected, inadequately substantiated, or clearly unfounded.
- The limitation period for the obligation to pay was governed by Art. 105 para. 3 let. a and Art. 42 MWSTG, as no qualified offence was recognized.
- The absolute statute of limitations had expired for the 2014 tax period, so the taxpayer’s appeal was partially approved for that year.
Source: search.bger.ch
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Switzerland"
- Federal Council Launches Consultation on VAT Law Amendments for Digital Services and Service Combinations
- Swiss Government Considers VAT Increase to Boost Military Funding Amid Security Concerns
- Swiss VAT Declaration: Deadlines, Process, and Legal Requirements for Foreign Companies
- Switzerland Delays VAT Rate Increase to 8.8% Until 2028
- How and Why to Obtain a Swiss VAT Number: Requirements, Process, and Key Obligations for Foreign Companies














