The case analysed by the Advocate General refers to chain transactions occurred before the implementation of the so-called quick fixes introduced by EU Directive 2018/1910. The questions asked by the Polish referring court refers to the first sale performed by the Dutch intermediary company (B) which considered the acquisition from BOP as a Polish domestic sale, subject to local VAT while the local court believed that transport of goods should have been allocated to that sale meant as the only intra-Community supply.
Source DLA Piper
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Electricity Breakdown at Customs: HS 8502 or HS 8504 – 0% or 10% Duty?
- Conference Vienna University: Court of Justice of the European Union: Recent VAT Case Law (March 10-12)
- Comments EGC T-643/24: Unauthorised Music Use Qualifies as VAT-Taxable Service
- EU Approves Updated E-Invoicing Standard EN 16931-1 for B2B and 2030 Digital Reporting
- EPPO Uncovers €11.3M Customs Fraud in Antwerp Steamboat Probe; Three Arrested
