The case analysed by the Advocate General refers to chain transactions occurred before the implementation of the so-called quick fixes introduced by EU Directive 2018/1910. The questions asked by the Polish referring court refers to the first sale performed by the Dutch intermediary company (B) which considered the acquisition from BOP as a Polish domestic sale, subject to local VAT while the local court believed that transport of goods should have been allocated to that sale meant as the only intra-Community supply.
Source DLA Piper
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EESC Opinion: EPPO and OLAF Access to EU-Wide VAT Data to Combat Fraud
- General Court Confirms Dual VAT Liabilities Possible for Incorrect Invoicing of Intra-Community Supplies
- CJEU Rules ‘Financing’ Not Exempt in VAT Assessment of Factoring Transactions in Kosmiro Case
- Understanding the VAT Gap: Impact on Global Compliance, Business Operations, and Digital Tax Reforms
- EU Court Clarifies VAT Exemption Rules for Cost-Sharing Groups in Healthcare and Education Sectors
