The case analysed by the Advocate General refers to chain transactions occurred before the implementation of the so-called quick fixes introduced by EU Directive 2018/1910. The questions asked by the Polish referring court refers to the first sale performed by the Dutch intermediary company (B) which considered the acquisition from BOP as a Polish domestic sale, subject to local VAT while the local court believed that transport of goods should have been allocated to that sale meant as the only intra-Community supply.
Source DLA Piper
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Recent ECJ and General Court VAT Jurisprudence and Implications for EU Compliance – March 2026
- Comments on T-221/25: EU General Court confirms (former) Belgian VAT treatment of travel outside the EU
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 1 Judgment, 2 AG Opinions till April 30, 2026
- EU Courts Reshape Transfer Pricing’s Impact on Indirect Taxes
- ViDA: Implementation ”Single EU VAT Registration” in the Member States
