The case analysed by the Advocate General refers to chain transactions occurred before the implementation of the so-called quick fixes introduced by EU Directive 2018/1910. The questions asked by the Polish referring court refers to the first sale performed by the Dutch intermediary company (B) which considered the acquisition from BOP as a Polish domestic sale, subject to local VAT while the local court believed that transport of goods should have been allocated to that sale meant as the only intra-Community supply.
Source DLA Piper
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- VAT and Transfer Pricing – Four recent cases @ ECJ/CJEU – 3 cases decided, 1 AG Opinion
- Comments on ECJ C-639/24: Limits on Denying VAT Exemption for Intra-Community Supplies
- EU Advocate General: VAT Implications of Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Car Distribution Cases
- EU and Member States Introduce €2-€5 Parcel Customs Fees Ahead of 2026 Reforms
- ECJ C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal) – AG Opinion – VAT Adjustments in Intra-Group Transfer Pricing Not Separate Supplies
