Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court, following the court, ruled that X bv performs one single (composite) supply, namely the sale of (bedroom) products. X bv has not been able to demonstrate that the reduced VAT rate applies to this service. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation inadmissible.
Source: taxlive.nl (Dutch)
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Thrift Shops Return to Court Over VAT Collection Dispute
- Customs Court Rules Doctor Role Play Set as Toys, Not Clothing
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
