- A&P Deco built and renovated a business building, deducted all VAT, then transferred its business in 2013 and on the same day leased the property back to the transferee under VAT-exempt rent.
- The Belgian tax authority said this exempt rental changed the building’s use from taxable to exempt activities, triggering a pro rata VAT adjustment on the original input VAT.
- The Court held that A&P Deco must indeed revise the deducted VAT, because the new lease is a new right and not part of the transfer of a universal business; therefore the rental stays with the transferor for VAT purposes.
- The transferee cannot be made liable for that adjustment, since that would tax someone involved in a transaction it did not participate in, contrary to neutrality and equal treatment.
- The Court distinguished this case from sale-and-lease-back and Faxworld, emphasizing that VAT recovery must match actual use of the property for taxable vs. exempt activities.
Source: btwjurisprudentie.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 1 AG Opinion, 2 Hearings till November 13, 2026
- ECJ & General Court VAT Cases decided in 2026
- General Court – T-569/25 (X-GmbH) – Judgment – VAT Margin Scheme: Good Faith of the Taxable Dealer Must Be Examined in the Tax Assessment Procedure
- Flashback on ECJ Cases C-481/98 (Commission v France) – Different medicinal-product rates respected fiscal neutrality
- EU Parliament Proposes Single VAT Number and Expanded One Stop Shop













