- The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal ruled that X must pay VAT on the sale of 56 cars in 2015 and 2016, as these sales were considered part of the liquidation of X’s car rental business and not private assets.
- The court rejected X’s claims that some vehicles were sold to his spouse, citing a lack of credible documentation and registration, and upheld the Tax and Customs Administration’s estimated VAT assessment.
- X’s subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court was declared inadmissible due to the failure to submit a sufficient power of attorney.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Medical VAT Exemption Applies to Independent Doctor’s Assistant
- Dutch Court Upholds VAT on Pension Provider X, Rejecting Exempt Fund Status
- Pension administrator does not meet the conditions for VAT exemption
- Objection only against fine; Declaration of inadmissibility justified
- Flashback on ECJ cases – C-20/91 (De Jong/Staatssecretaris van Financiën) – Private-use charge covers the building, not the land
