- The Supreme Court ruled that no penalty can be imposed under Article 67f AWR when the zero VAT rate is denied due to involvement in VAT fraud.
- The additional tax assessments remain, but the penalties are annulled.
- For a penalty under Article 67f AWR, intent or gross negligence must relate to non-payment of tax owed in the Netherlands.
- In this case, the accusation concerned VAT evasion in another EU member state, which is not punishable under Article 67f AWR.
- A broad interpretation of Article 67f AWR is not allowed due to the principle of legality (Article 7 ECHR).
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Amendments to VAT Compensation Fund Scheme for Investment Services Effective April 2026
- Court Rejects Proposed Settlement in VAT Fraud Case Due to Evidence and Sentence Concerns
- Dutch Tax Administration Update: Emergency VAT E-commerce Track Extended to 2028, Digital Mail Option in 2025
- Amendment to VAT Compensation Fund Rules for Investment Services Effective April 2026
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032













