- The CJEU ruled that tax courts can independently assess the right to deduct VAT, using evidence from dismissed criminal cases against third parties, as long as the rights of the defense are maintained.
- In the case of Fashion TV RO SRL, the Romanian tax authorities denied VAT deduction based on claims of fictitious transactions linked to inactive suppliers, despite the dismissal of criminal charges against the company’s director and accountant due to insufficient evidence.
- The court clarified that the ne bis in idem principle does not apply here, as it involves different legal entities, and reaffirmed that national courts must verify VAT deduction criteria, allowing for the consideration of evidence from criminal proceedings to establish potential fraud or misuse.
Source BTW Jurisprudentie
See also
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
- Podcasts & briefing documents: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Abolition of the customs duty exemption for small consignments under EUR 150: what does this mean for e-commerce?
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 8 Judgments, 1 AG Opinion and 2 Hearings till March 18, 2026
- New ECG Case T-96/26 (TellusTax Advisory) – No details known yet
- Boost your knowledge of EU’s VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA)
- VAT and TOMS: Simplification or Added Complexity for European Tour Operators?












