- Anvi Kumar, a 17-year-old student, filed a PIL in the Supreme Court challenging the lack of transparency in the government’s categorization of mental health services under GST
- An RTI application was filed seeking clarification on the 18% GST rate on mental health services
- Questions were raised about the government’s research and stakeholder engagement before implementing the tax
- NIMHANS stated that “GST is generally not applicable to Mental Health Services,” creating ambiguity
- Anvi launched a Change.org campaign to raise awareness and gather support for transparent policies on mental health affordability and accessibility
- The PIL aims to push for clearer government policies that prioritize mental health care and ensure its affordability and accessibility
Source: a2ztaxcorp.com
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "India"
- AAR Rules GST Applies to Small Packaged Shrimp Exports, Citing Retail Packaging Criteria
- Supreme Court to Decide if Leasehold Rights Transfer is Taxable Under GST Law
- Only Entity Named as Exporter in Customs Documents Can Claim Service Tax Refund: CESTAT
- CESTAT: Testing Services to Foreign Clients Qualify as ‘Export of Services’ under FTDR Act
- CESTAT Rules Dell India’s Services to Foreign Affiliates Qualify as Export, Allows Appeal
