- Municipality X was obligated to collect household waste under the Environmental Management Act
- Packaging industry had an agreement with the Ministry of VROM and VNG to fund waste collection activities
- Municipalities received compensation from the fund for their activities related to waste collection
- Municipality X was considered to be conducting economic activities as an entrepreneur
- Municipality X appealed the decision, and the Court ruled in favor of the inspector
- Municipality X appealed to the Amsterdam Court of Appeal, which agreed with the lower court’s decision
- However, the Court of Appeal accepted Municipality X’s argument regarding the reverse charge mechanism
- The Court of Appeal ruled that the waste separation services provided by Municipality X qualified as processing services under the reverse charge mechanism
- The Court of Appeal upheld Municipality X’s appeal against the inspector’s decision
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients














