ADCL, a private medical clinic, challenged HMRC’s VAT liability and lost, resulting in a £1.6 million assessment for failing to register and account for VAT since 2010. HMRC usually exempts cosmetic services if they are part of a health care treatment program, but purely cosmetic services are standard-rated. The VAT legislation requires services to be for the protection, maintenance, or restoration of health, and the recent case of ADCL confirmed that purely cosmetic services do not qualify for VAT exemption. ADCL failed to prove that their services had a therapeutic purpose, leading to the conclusion that their services did not constitute medical care.
Source Baker Tilly
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Autumn Budget VAT Consultation May Affect Social Housing and Real Estate Sector Compliance
- VAT IOSS Scheme: Intermediary Registration Available from April 2026 for Non-EU Businesses
- UK Tribunal Ruling Paves Way for 5% VAT on Public EV Charging, Treasury Reviews Policy
- Court Rules Public EV Charging Should Have Reduced 5% VAT Instead of 20%
- Intermediary Registration for UK Import One Stop Shop Scheme Opens April 2026
