The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that X was not entitled to an additional VAT refund because she did not prove that she was providing VAT-taxed services when she rented out the premises to the library, city shop, music school, and community centre. The court also stated that X failed to demonstrate a right to a greater refund than what had already been granted. The inspector had already granted more refund than X was entitled to, so X’s claim was unfounded.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Despite the absence of a tax representative, the application of the zero rate
- Comments on T-184/25: Transfers of credit portfolios and VAT: AG puts credit management exemption under pressure
- New Four-Year VAT Adjustment for Investment Services on Real Estate Starting 2026
- VAT refund rightly refused due to unproven previous payment
- VAT Rules for Unpaid Invoices: When Can Entrepreneurs Reclaim or Repay VAT?
