The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that X was not entitled to an additional VAT refund because she did not prove that she was providing VAT-taxed services when she rented out the premises to the library, city shop, music school, and community centre. The court also stated that X failed to demonstrate a right to a greater refund than what had already been granted. The inspector had already granted more refund than X was entitled to, so X’s claim was unfounded.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands: No VAT building land for conditional demolition obligation
- Netherlands: VAT Deduction Dispute for Municipal Entrepreneurs Fund Foundation
- VAT zero rate for export of competition horse to Malaysia
- Netherlands: Bicycle Maintenance Package Qualifies as Separate Service at Reduced VAT Rate
- Entrepreneurs’ fund does not meet conditions for approval of VAT deduction
