The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that X was not entitled to an additional VAT refund because she did not prove that she was providing VAT-taxed services when she rented out the premises to the library, city shop, music school, and community centre. The court also stated that X failed to demonstrate a right to a greater refund than what had already been granted. The inspector had already granted more refund than X was entitled to, so X’s claim was unfounded.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
