The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court ruled that X was not entitled to an additional VAT refund because she did not prove that she was providing VAT-taxed services when she rented out the premises to the library, city shop, music school, and community centre. The court also stated that X failed to demonstrate a right to a greater refund than what had already been granted. The inspector had already granted more refund than X was entitled to, so X’s claim was unfounded.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Compensation for Late Decision on VAT Refund
- VAT Exemption for STI and HPV Test Kits as Healthcare Services
- Option for VAT-Taxed Rental Invalid Where Part of the Property is Sub-Let VAT-Exempt – No Input VAT Recovery for Tenant
- Hoge Raad Confirms Justified VAT Assessments on Gold Trader (Art. 81 RO) – Failure to File “Required Returns” Reverses Burden of Proof
- VAT Exemption Applies to Self-Test Kits for STIs and HPV Offered by Commercial Provider
