- Mrs. X organized outings where wedding dresses were tried on with accompanying accessories.
- She claimed the reduced VAT rate for this service.
- The court ruled that the 21% VAT rate was applicable.
- The services provided by Mrs. X did not fall under the specified category for reduced VAT.
- To read the full article, registration or a subscription is required.
Source: futd.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Netherlands 2026 Tax Plan: VAT Reversal, Property Rules, and Cross-Border Compliance Changes
- Court Ruling on Customs Debt Liability and Warehouse Regulation Compliance in Noord-Holland Case
- Supreme Court Ruling on VAT Refund Request and Objection Admissibility, September 12, 2025
- Court Denies Zero VAT Rate for Intra-Community Supplies Due to Insufficient Evidence
- Court Ruling on Tax Assessment and EU Defense Rights Principle Compliance
