- The inspector wrongly assumed the regular management fee instead of the reduced fee actually paid.
- X provides management services for A bv.
- The management fee was reduced when A bv came under financial supervision.
- X included the reduced fee in the VAT returns for 2015 and 2016.
- The inspector claims that the regular fee should be considered as invoiced.
- X argues that VAT is only due on the actual invoiced revenue.
- The court ruled in favor of the inspector, but the higher court overturned the decision.
- The higher court states that the actual invoiced amount should be used when a lower amount is charged.
- X’s appeal is successful.
Source: taxlive.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients














