The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that X bv is not a VAT entrepreneur and the reverse charge mechanism does not apply to services charged to X bv. The loans were not provided on a commercial basis and there is no economic activity. As a result, the additional tax assessment imposed on X bv was deemed to be wrongly imposed.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Tax Fraud Lessons: The Perils of Mixing Business and Personal Finances
- Entrepreneur Bound by Settlement Agreement in Tax Reassessment Case on Luxury Watches Sales
- Financial Application Disruption at Customs Halts Payments, Urgent Payment Requests Possible
- New VAT Rules for Mixed-Use Buildings: Changes Effective July 1, 2025
- Guidelines for VAT Rates on Mixed-Use Properties Effective July 1, 2025
