The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that X bv is not a VAT entrepreneur and the reverse charge mechanism does not apply to services charged to X bv. The loans were not provided on a commercial basis and there is no economic activity. As a result, the additional tax assessment imposed on X bv was deemed to be wrongly imposed.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026
