- If a recipient of a service has paid too much VAT to the provider and fails to deduct input tax, they rely on the provider to refund the corresponding tax amount.
- If the civil law repayment fails, the recipient can rely on the Reemtsma claim (direct claim) as a solution.
- The European Court of Justice clarifies that the Reemtsma claim also applies when the provider invokes civil law limitation against the recipient.
- The European Court of Justice restricts the correction by the provider under § 14c UStG and confirms an interest claim by the recipient.
- If the recipient is unable to enforce the civil law claim or it is excessively difficult, they may have a direct claim.
Source: datenbank.nwb.de
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- Tax-Free Status for Insurance Contract Tariff Optimization Without Changing Insurer Confirmed by BFH Ruling
- BMF Issues Final Guidance on E-Invoice Error Categories and Validation Requirements
- No VAT Exemption for Treatments by Non-Accredited Private Hospitals, Rules Federal Fiscal Court
- Germany Updates E-Invoicing FAQs: Key Clarifications on Scope, Exemptions, and Transition Periods
- BFH Limits Personal VAT Liability of Insolvent Debtors to Insolvency Estate, Not Private Assets
