- The Dutch Supreme Court has referred questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding the liability of directors for VAT debts.
- The case involves a director of a holding company who was held liable for unpaid payroll tax and VAT by a subsidiary company.
- The Court of Appeal ruled that the subsidiary company had not fulfilled its obligation to report payment incapacity, and therefore the director was rightly held liable, although for a reduced amount.
- The director argues that the severe penalty for failing to report payment incapacity is disproportionate.
- The Supreme Court agrees that there is doubt regarding the liability for VAT debts and whether the Dutch law is in line with EU law.
- The Supreme Court has suspended the case and referred questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding the proportionality of the liability and the requirement of good faith on the part of the director.
Source: taxence.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Rules Non-Transactional Profit Adjustments by Principal Are VAT-Applicable Services in Arcomet Case
- Understanding VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing: Insights from Arcomet Case C-726/23
- VAT Implications on Transfer Pricing Adjustments: Insights from Acromet Towercranes Case
- CJEU Ruling: Transfer Pricing Adjustments Impact VAT in Arcomet Case (C-726/23)
- EU Court of Justice Rules Transfer Pricing Payments Subject to VAT in Arcomet Case