The UT has held that the Trust was entitled to a refund of VAT under the COS regime. The UT agreed with HMRC that the concept of ‘supply’ for VAT purposes, including case law on whether there was a single or multiple supply, was relevant. This was in contrast to the Trust’s argument that whether a transaction fell within the relevant COS provisions should be determined as a matter of simple language or classification and that it was only necessary to establish that the combined services corresponded to the description in COS.
Source: deloitte.com
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- FINTUA Global VAT Guide for September 2025
- UK Supreme Court Rules VAT Applicable on Success Fees After Exit from VAT Group
- JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v HMRC: VAT Dispute on Intra-group Service Taxability, Appeal Dismissed
- UK Considers VAT Cut on Domestic Fuel: Targeted Relief or Broad Measure?
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
