The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that importer is liable for making forged imports. And penalty under section 114 A was charged against the importer. Shri S.C. Jain Advocate appeared for the Appellant and Shri Rakesh Kumar appeared for the Department. In the instant case,2 appeals assailing…
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- GST on Dine-in, Takeaway, and Delivery App Orders: Rates, Compliance, and Reporting Differences
- Ensuring ITC Compliance: Mastering GSTR-2B Reconciliation and Audit Readiness for 2026
- India’s E-Invoicing Rules: Scope, Formats, Penalties, and Compliance Under the GST Framework
- Continuous Supply of Services Under GST: Legal Criteria Versus Commercial Practice Explained
- Tripura HC: ITC Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Purchaser for Supplier’s Tax Default
