The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court rules that X bv is not entitled to deduct the VAT stated in the notarial deed. The witness statements show that X bv, director I and the civil-law notary have set up a construction to obtain a tax advantage fraudulently. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Rules Support Services to Disciplinary Tribunals Subject to VAT
- Dutch cabinet plans mandatory e-invoicing and digital reporting for domestic B2B transactions
- Tax Authority Releases Explanation Video on Intra-EU Trade and VAT Return
- Dutch e-Invoicing and e-Reporting Mandates Align with EU ViDA Timeline
- Netherlands to Mandate E-Invoicing in 2030, Digital VAT Reporting in 2031
