The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court rules that X bv is not entitled to deduct the VAT stated in the notarial deed. The witness statements show that X bv, director I and the civil-law notary have set up a construction to obtain a tax advantage fraudulently. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence
- Decree on Mediation in Securities Transactions with Instructions on the Scope of the Concept of Mediation Published
- Tax Penalty for VAT Reduced Due to Incidental Carelessness; Court Lowers Fine to €1,500
- Thrift Shops Return to Court to Challenge VAT on Second-Hand Goods
- E-invoicing and Digital Reporting for Cross-border Transactions Starting July 2030
