The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court rules that X bv is not entitled to deduct the VAT stated in the notarial deed. The witness statements show that X bv, director I and the civil-law notary have set up a construction to obtain a tax advantage fraudulently. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
- Court Rules Sale-and-Leaseback Property Transfer Not Exempt from Transfer Tax
