The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court rules that X bv is not entitled to deduct the VAT stated in the notarial deed. The witness statements show that X bv, director I and the civil-law notary have set up a construction to obtain a tax advantage fraudulently. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation without further motivation unfounded (art. 81 paragraph 1 RO Act).
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT deduction apartment: business office or home? Ruling on actual use and the principle of equality
- Budget 2026: VAT Rate Reversals, Property Rules & Cross-Border Compliance
- No deduction for VAT on consultancy costs for business succession within family
- VAT exemption for games of chance: strict interpretation for B2B game content
- Court Decision on Tax Rate for Art Products: Classification and Maker Status Dispute
