According to the Court of Appeal, BV X had not made it plausible that renting the accommodations was primarily prompted by the special needs of the company. The Supreme Court had explained in the order for reference that it was relevant whether the temporary workers accepted the accommodation offered to them, without leaving them room – in a legal or factual sense – for their own choice of a particular accommodation or with regard to its shared use by one or more others.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No VAT Deduction for New Atelier House Construction, Court Rules Against Taxable Rental Option
- Low-Care Hospice Entitled to VAT Deduction for Services Provided, Court Rules
- Court Allows Partial VAT Deduction for New Complex Construction Costs; Appeal Partially Successful
- eInvoicing in The Netherlands
- Netherlands 2026 Tax Plan: VAT Reversal, Property Rules, and Cross-Border Compliance Changes
