Interpretation Note 57 “Sale of an enterprise or part thereof as a going concern” discusses the detailed requirements for a supply to be zero-rated under section 11(1)(e). In terms of that provision, it is a specific requirement that certain aspects must be agreed upon in writing. Applicants should therefore not apply for a VAT Ruling merely to confirm that the agreement meets the necessary requirements in order to treat the supply as a going concern. This is because it is a question of fact whether or not the agreement meets the requirements, as opposed to the interpretation or application of the law based on a set of facts. Also, as SARS has provided comprehensive guidance on the interpretation of the law in respect of a supply of a going concern in an official publication, it is generally not considered necessary to issue a VAT Ruling in this regard, and applications in this regard may be rejected. However, should there be uncertainty about the interpretation or application of section 11(1)(e) in respect of a specific transaction, applicants should clearly illustrate what that uncertainty is, as well as the applicant’s interpretation of the VAT Act in that regard, when an application for a VAT Ruling is submitted.
Source: gov.za
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- High Court Upholds Tax Court Ruling: Payroll Service Provider Not Liable for SDL and VAT
- Eswatini’s E-Invoicing Initiative: Advancing Tax Compliance and Digital Transformation by January 2028
- South Africa to End VAT Exemption on Low-Value Imports, Impacting eCommerce and Education
- South Africa to Implement E-Invoicing and Real-Time VAT Reporting in Major Tax Overhaul
- Law to Phase Out Import VAT Relief on Small Parcels
