Interpretation Note 57 “Sale of an enterprise or part thereof as a going concern” discusses the detailed requirements for a supply to be zero-rated under section 11(1)(e). In terms of that provision, it is a specific requirement that certain aspects must be agreed upon in writing. Applicants should therefore not apply for a VAT Ruling merely to confirm that the agreement meets the necessary requirements in order to treat the supply as a going concern. This is because it is a question of fact whether or not the agreement meets the requirements, as opposed to the interpretation or application of the law based on a set of facts. Also, as SARS has provided comprehensive guidance on the interpretation of the law in respect of a supply of a going concern in an official publication, it is generally not considered necessary to issue a VAT Ruling in this regard, and applications in this regard may be rejected. However, should there be uncertainty about the interpretation or application of section 11(1)(e) in respect of a specific transaction, applicants should clearly illustrate what that uncertainty is, as well as the applicant’s interpretation of the VAT Act in that regard, when an application for a VAT Ruling is submitted.
Source: gov.za
Latest Posts in "South Africa"
- South Africa Advances Toward Mandatory Peppol E-Invoicing and Real-Time VAT Reporting by 2028
- South Africa Moves Toward Mandatory E-Invoicing and Real-Time VAT Reporting Under SARS Modernisation
- South Africa to Launch Mandatory E-Invoicing and E-Reporting by 2028 Under New VAT Framework
- Court Upholds 15-Year Sentence for R3.6m VAT Fraud, Denies Juan Maritz’s Appeal
- South Africa’s E-Invoicing and Real-Time VAT: Transforming Tax Compliance and Business Transparency
