The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that X bv did not purchase the services directly from the service providers, but that it did have an interest in the services. According to the Court of Appeal, X bv has taken on 75% of certain payments in return for services rendered.
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Knowledge group: no reduced VAT rate for head spa treatment hairdresser
- No Reduced VAT Rate for Head Spa Treatments at Hairdressers, Dutch Tax Group Rules
- Comments on ECJ C-232/24: Both factoring but also invoice financing subject to VAT
- Netherlands Plans Mandatory Peppol-Based B2B E-Invoicing Regime by July 2030
- Netherlands Tourism at Risk: Experts Warn VAT Hike Could Harm Industry and Economy
