The case concerned whether a company had VAT-exempt activity in accordance with the VAT Act, section 13, subsection. 1, no. 10. The National Tax Court found that the company provided services subject to VAT, as there was no question of the company providing services as an insurance intermediary, cf. section 13 (1) of the VAT Act. 1, no. 10, or that the company was an intermediary of insurance products in its own name for a foreign account, cf. section 4 (1) of the VAT Act. 4. The National Tax Court hereby takes into account e.g. that the second of the conditions mentioned in Aspiro, C-40/15, paragraph 37, was not satisfied, since its services were not linked to the very nature of the profession of insurance broker or intermediary, which consists in searching for leads; and put them in touch with the insurer for the purpose of concluding insurance contracts. As the case stood,
Source: skat.dk
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- Updated DAC7 and DAC8 Reporting Rules for Digital Platforms and Crypto-Asset Service Providers
- Denmark’s 2026 VAT Changes: Impact on Education, Fitness, and Mental Sports Activities
- Denmark’s Conservative Party Proposes Removing 25% VAT on Fruits and Vegetables to Lower Costs
- Denmark Finalizes SAF-T 2.0 Consultation, Prepares for Enhanced Digital Accounting Standards
- Denmark Launches Consultation on SAF-T 2.0