The Limburg District Court has rendered judgment without a hearing on the basis of Article 8:54 Awb. It follows from HR of 13 April 2018 that the Dutch legislator has not drawn up any regulations governing the granting or rejection of a VAT identification number. For this reason, no competent administrative body has been designated, nor has legal protection against decisions on allocation been provided for. However, it follows from the structure of the OB Act and the other tax laws that the Tax and Customs Administration is the competent administrative body in this case.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
