In a plethora of judgments various courts have taken a view that the procedural grounds can not supersede the provisions of the legislation. In line of those judgments recently the honorable Kerala High court in the matter of the St. Joseph Tea Company Ltd Vs. (i) The State Tax Officer (ii) Deputy Commissioner , State GST Department (iii) State Goods & Service Tax Department (iv) Goods & Service Tax Network Ltd {WP (C) No. 17235 of 2020}, has examined the facts of the case and accordingly ordered that the ITC shall not be denied only on the ground that the transaction is not reflected in GSTR 2A.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- Himachal Pradesh Assembly Approves VAT Bill, Permits Up to ₹5 Cess on Petrol, Diesel
- Karnataka AAR Allows ITC on Ancillary Expenses for Used Vehicles Sold Under Margin Scheme
- ISD Credit Distribution Allowed Only After ITC Eligibility Under Section 16, Rules Madras High Court
- Hookah Served in Restaurants Not Restaurant Service, Taxed Separately: West Bengal AAR Rules
- Key Changes in RBI’s FEMA Export and Import Regulations, 2026: Integrated Rules and Reporting Updates
