VATupdate

Share this post on

Flashback on ECJ Cases – C-125/12 (Promociones y Construcciones BJ 200) – Sale in the context of insolvency proceedings before liquidation proceedings is also public sale

On June 13, 2013, the ECJ issued its decision in the case C-125/12 (Promociones y Construcciones BJ 200).

Context: Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 199(1)(g) – Voluntary insolvency proceedings – Person liable for payment of tax – Liability of the person who is the recipient of certain transactions – Concept of ‘compulsory sale procedure’


Article in the EU VAT Directive

Article 199(1)(g) in EU VAT Directive 2006/112/EC

Article 199
1. Member States may provide that the person liable for payment of VAT is the taxable person to whom any of the following supplies are made:

(g) the supply of immovable property sold by a judgment debtor in a compulsory sale procedure.


Facts

  • By order of 22 February 2010, Promociones y Construcciones was declared insolvent and voluntary insolvency proceedings (‘proceso concursal voluntario’) were instituted.
  • During the general stage of those proceedings, the insolvency administrator provided a report on the assets and liabilities of Promociones y Construcciones to its creditors and to the referring court.
  • The opportunity to sell two of the company’s properties subsequently arose. On 31 January 2012, the company, on the basis of a favourable report from the insolvency administrator and with the consent of the purchaser, Banesto SA, requested authorisation to carry out that sale under Law 22/2003 on insolvency proceedings (Ley 22/2003, Concursal), of 9 July 2003 (BOE No 164 of 10 July 2003, p. 26905).
  • By order of 1 February 2012, which has become final and has not been challenged, the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Granada (Granada No 1 Commercial Court) declared that that sale was timely and conducive to the interests of the general body of creditors and consequently authorised it.
  • The authorisation of that sale, which is an integral part of Promociones y Construcciones’s commercial activity, gave rise to a chargeable event for purposes of VAT, triggering the obligation to pay to the Agencia Estatal de Administracíon Tributaria (State tax administration) the corresponding sum owed in respect of VAT.
  • The referring court expresses doubts as to the identity of the debtor liable for payment of that tax debt, namely whether it is Promociones y Construcciones or the purchaser of the properties. The referring court considers that that question is relevant for the purposes of determining precisely the terms on which the sale, as authorised, is to be carried out.

Questions

Must Article 199(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, providing as it does that ‘1. Member States may provide that the person liable for payment of VAT is the taxable person to whom any of the following supplies are made: … (g) the supply of immovable property sold by a judgment debtor in a compulsory sale procedure‘, be interpreted, in court proceedings that are creditor proceedings initiated by a declaration as to the insolvency of that debtor, to the effect that it refers only to transfers which strictly reflect the fact that the proceedings are liquidation proceedings or that they have reached the phase of liquidation, with the result that the disposal of such immovable property must take place as a consequence of the liquidation of all the debtor’s assets, or, given that insolvency proceedings may end, among other possibilities, with the liquidation of the insolvent undertaking, does it also cover any transfers of immovable property carried out in the course of insolvency proceedings by a debtor declared insolvent?
Must Article 199(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax be interpreted to the effect that the ‘compulsory sale procedure’ to which it refers includes a collective judicial insolvency procedure in which there has been a voluntary sale, unconnected with any phase of compulsory liquidation of the debtor’s assets and for reasons merely of timeliness, of any one or more of its assets; or, on the contrary, does it refer only to sales ordered in enforcement proceedings intended to liquidate the assets of the judgment debtor?
In the latter case, if Article 199(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax refers strictly to sales in enforcement proceedings intended to liquidate the assets of a judgment debtor, may that provision be interpreted as excluding reversal of the position regarding the taxable person for VAT purposes in any case where immovable property is transferred by a debtor declared insolvent because such transfer is timely and conducive to the interests of the insolvency and the transfer is unconnected with any procedure for liquidation of all the debtor’s assets, with the result that it is necessary to disapply a national law which has extended the material scope of Article 199(1)(g) of Directive 2006/112 to cases which that provision does not contemplate?

AG Opinion

None


Decision

Article 199(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that every sale of immovable property by a judgment debtor carried out not only in the course of the liquidation of the debtor’s assets but also in the course of insolvency proceedings occurring before such liquidation comes within the concept of a compulsory sale procedure, provided that such a sale is necessary in order either to settle creditors’ claims or to enable the debtor to re-establish its economic or professional activities.


Summary

Article 199(1)(g) of the VAT Directive must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of a public sale under an enforceable order covers any sale of immovable property by the enforceable debtor, not only in the context of proceedings for the winding up of its assets, but also in the context of insolvency proceedings that take place before those liquidation proceedings, to the extent that such sale is necessary for the payment of the creditors or for the restoration of the economic or professional activity of that debtor.


Source:


Similar ECJ cases


 

Newsletters

Sponsors:

VAT news

Advertisements:

  • AXWAY - VATupdate Banner
  • VATupdate.com
  • vatcomsult