VATupdate

Share this post on

Week of May 24, 2021 – What did we learn from the ECJ (VAT)?

Decision/Order issued

AG Opinion

  • None

New cases – Questions released

New cases – Questions not released yet

  • None

Flashback on ECJ Cases

ECJ Collection

ECJ Activity in the week of May 31, 2021

June 3, 2021

  • Decision in C-931/19 Titanium

An Austrian referral asking whether the term ‘fixed establishment’ is to be interpreted as meaning that the existence of human and technical resources is always necessary and therefore that the service provider’s own staff must be present at the establishment? Can a passive holding in a property, which is subject to a taxable letting in a national territory, even without human resources, be regarded as a ‘fixed establishment’?

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

  • AG Opinion in C-90/20 Apcoa Parking Danmark

A Danish referral asking whether Article 2(1)(c) of the VAT Directive is to be interpreted as meaning that control fees for parking infringements on private property constitute consideration for a taxable supply?

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

  • Decision in C-182/20 Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Suceava and Others

A romanian referral related to Input VAT deduction prior to insolvency proceedings

Previous posts about this case can be found HERE

Sponsors:

VAT news
VAT news

Advertisements:

  • vatcomsult
  • VATupdate.com