According to the Court of Appeal, X’s activities could not be classified as anything other than performances that could be classified under the exemption of Article 11 (1) (f), Wet OB both on the basis of the text of the national provisions and on the apparent intention of the directive provision underlying the national exemption, which referred to services closely related to social work and social security.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Car Sales VAT Case: Zero-Rating Denied for Failure to Verify Buyer and Prevent Fraud
- Dutch Hospitality Sector Warns of Economic Damage from 21% VAT on Lodging Starting 2026
- VAT in a Day – Fourth edition available now
- Revision of VAT deduction for investment services as of 1 January 2026
- Impact of Higher VAT Rate on Accommodation Has Little Effect on Budget Estimates
