According to the Court of Appeal, X’s activities could not be classified as anything other than performances that could be classified under the exemption of Article 11 (1) (f), Wet OB both on the basis of the text of the national provisions and on the apparent intention of the directive provision underlying the national exemption, which referred to services closely related to social work and social security.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?
- VAT Implications for ‘Free’ Online Services: Legal Challenges and Potential Impact on SMEs
- Court Denies Tax Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs as Private Expenses
- No deduction of input tax for private advisory fees shareholders
