This case was about Bulgarian legislation which does not allow a lawyer and his client to agree remuneration in an amount below the minimum amount laid down in a regulation issued by a lawyers’ professional organisation. The ECJ ruled that article 78 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, by virtue of which VAT forms an inseparable component part of a registered lawyers’ fees, if that legislation leads to double taxation of those fees in respect of VAT.
Source: Curia
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- From Accounting Entry to Taxable Event: The Acromet Case and VAT-TP Implications
- DG TAXUD Extends ICS2 Road and Rail Transport Deadline to December 31, 2025
- Potential VAT Changes for Travel Businesses: UK and EU TOMS Reforms, New Platform Rules
- EU Report Highlights Need for Enhanced Customs Controls Amid E-Commerce Growth and Non-Compliance
- Recent ECJ/General Court VAT Jurisprudence and Implications for EU Compliance (Jul–Aug 2025)
