The plaintiff and the defendant (plaintiff) has a wine-growing business, a “wine commission” business and provides agricultural services. The plaintiff taxed his agricultural sales in accordance with § 24 UStG, the rest in accordance with § 20 UStG.
In 2006, the plaintiff expanded his business premises and built a mixed-use residential building.
Source: bundesfinanzhof.de
Latest Posts in "Germany"
- Germany Passes 2025 Tax Amendment Act: VAT Cuts for Restaurants, Individual Relief, Nonprofit Updates
- Many Companies Still Uncertain About E-Invoice Validation Despite New Legal Requirements
- Germany and France Synchronize E-Invoicing Standards Ahead of EU ViDA Mandates
- Corrected or Late Invoices? BFH Confirms VAT Recovery Still Possible
- Avoiding VAT by Withdrawing Assets Before Sale: New Legal Clarifications
